Archive for April 9th, 2012
It’s much faster and simpler than a photo deposit. (I can also get cash while I’m there. Can’t do that with the iPhone app.)
And then it’s done. The check is out of sight and out of mind. I know that if anything goes wrong, the bank will mail me something about it, although I’ve never had an ATM-deposited check get rejected by the bank later.
Sometimes, new technology is not progress.
[I hope the folks at Simple are listening. (Hey, where's my invite anyway? :) The thing is, simply using cool technology is never enough. It has to provide a better experience. If it doesn't it's a failure. Certainly you don't want a process that's worse than old way, or less flexible.]
ReadWriteWeb, Jon Mitchell: Websites Have to Get Better:
Read-later apps are competition for noisy, ad-ridden websites. They represent a simple fact: Users hate our sites.
Dave Winer suggests:
Generate a community of template designers who create readable templates that we can use in content management systems… Make it easy for people to make readable sites. And beautiful and have advertising. Help solve the problem.
[It's like the golden age of designers. I don't think the impact of design has ever been given more play. And the same open source tools that work for developers probably work well fr designers (I'm thinking Github here). I wonder if there is a too much 'individuality' still bred into the designer space.]
Books May Be Better Objects, but E-Books Are Better Tools: I have some significant concerns about Amazon’s increasing dominance over the publishing world, and the company may not keep my loyalty forever; but the transferability they have enabled is a huge boon to me in my work. Years ago, when I was a young book collector, I decided that I had to spend my money on books for use rather than display — I didn’t have the resources to be a collector and a scholar. Similar thoughts have prompted my recent move towards electronic texts. Like Nick Carr, I love the fixities of the book as a designed object; but the resources offered by digital versions of texts make my life as a scholar far easier than it has ever been. I can’t resist that.
Jacobs makes a very important point that ebooks are often far better tools for daily use. When Apple introduced Multi-touch books in iBooks 2, they made a big point about the ease of fast navigation in the textbook – something that is crushingly awful on a hardware Kindle.
At the same time, iBooks doesn’t have a “back” button so navigating around a book via hyperlinks is fraught with the danger of losing your place.
[I wish I had tie to dig into the process of creating something via iBook Author. I thin I'd learn a lot about how my son will be reading in a few years.]
Source: Fraser Speirs