100 Miles of Nowhere 2011

For the last few years one of the annual rights of spring has been to raise money for charity by doing something ridiculous on my bike… namely riding some crazy distance in very small circles. Yesterday’s circle was a 1/4 mile… round and round at the Kissena Park Velodrome in Queens.

Kissena Park Velodrome

Though serious looking at the start, with early laps and other athletic looking gestures made, the hilarity was not far behind. First we were buzzed by the locals who happen to get out early and fly their radio controlled airplanes, helicopters, and whatnot, doing loops and aerobatics not far over our heads. The wind, which became a constant companion started to create the home straight headwind. And the track was far bumpier than I would have thought a track would be, except this is a public park, in NYC, and so I should have known better.

Carlos and Jamieson warming up

There were piles of food (this was Team Fatty event afterall) and enough spare tires, tubes, pumps, water, etc. to keep a small race team in good shape for a half a season.

Round 'n round

So in typical Team Fatty fashion, there was joy, and unending laughs, and the insanity of riding (in my case) a metric century in 1/4 mile circles (I did 250 laps…)

Thoughts for a Monday morning…

  • Ignore Your Critics
  • Turn the Ordinary into Something Beautiful
  • Justify Your Price
  • Communicate in the Language of Your Audience
  • Extend the Experience
  • Build a Tribe
  • Become “The Name”
  • Do what you think is best.
  • Go with your instinct.
  • Take risks that quickly display failure or success, you can learn from either.
  • Don’t be afraid of consequences. Everything has them.
  • Prioritize your endeavors.
  • Sacrifice is a necessity.
  • Enjoy your successes. Celebrating what you’ve done will only lead you to yearning for more.
  • Always ask: “What might lie over the horizon?”

Sempe21

When time became money

From The Secret Diary Of Steve Jobs:

…much of what we call “news” is really entertainment, and entertainment of the worst sort. Beck, O’Reilly, Limbaugh, Olbermann, Ed Schultz. It’s not right or left. It’s both. It’s shouting, and name-calling, and demonization, and it’s all fun and games until someone gets shot.

As for the Internet, let’s just be honest: Much of what we now call “news” online isn’t even entertainment, it’s garbage.

There. I said it.

It’s garbage precisely because online news sites are not primarily created to report news. They’re created to make money. Problem is, it’s nearly impossible to make money doing what they do. So they resort to ever more desperate tricks.

or put another way

“needing some air, he went into the garden.
‘ah, look at the afternoon light,’ he said,
for shadows were forming dark zones
in the pasture recesses,
as they do in his masterpiece,
‘the mountain.’

he went over to a small shed
in the corner of the garden,
the back wall of which was made of
finely carved wood shingles
arranged in a design.

‘you see,’ he said, ‘the trouble they took
for something that could not even be seen.
that is what has been lost. it was lost
when workers began selling their time.
or as you say in america,
when time became money.’ ”

Letting go

There is an article about trusting a builder to do what they do. We all love to apply the hard won knowledge we gain, and we all love to have things that are *just* what we want. There’s only one way to get that, and that is build, sew, weld, weave, and stack the work yourself. ‘Cause short of that it is a collaboration and the platonic plane of your projects existence is forever lost in that collaboration. Instead you jiggle the elbow of your partner about what they’re building and how. Craftsman bring there own experiences to project. What they like and dislike. What’s worked for them and what hasn’t. What they’ve had time to try and what they haven’t. You can find folks who will experiment on your dime, but you best have enough dimes to not be upset when the experiments fail. And if *my* experience tells me anything, it’s that more things fail than succeed. Either way it devolves the purity of the what you want to produce.

Find a builder of whatever who builds stuff you like and then having it tailored to you. It’ll be sized for you. You’ll discuss the qualities that are important to you. But if you really want to specify tube thickness and stay length you’re probably wasting your time and the craftsman’s. If you want to argue, argue over fit, where only you can say what’s comfortable. But in the end, you’d better off building your own, take the plunge, you’ll have fun!

The same problem exists in the software world. One of the hardest parts of working as a consultant was getting a business owner to trust you with the mechanics. Software is so scary (“Every project costs a fortune! They’re all late! I don’t understand what’s going on!”) for many business owners. Still, the mechanics of how data is stored, for example, is not what you should spend time discussing no matter how much the business owner thinks they know. How the software impacts the business, who would be using it and how, and other *real* requirements is where the crux of the biscuit lies. Sure, they may want to know why you’re doing what you’re doing, and you should explain. But chances are, unless there are far larger misunderstandings, that detail is not the one that makes or breaks the deal.

I read the blogs of a lot of tradesfolk. Builders of houses, bikes, cars, jewelry, clothes, and of course software. And they generally agree. Some limit people’s tendencies along these lines by only releasing their own designs. Other apply varying techniques, and some deal with building what you want and you not being happy. But no matter how they approach the business aspect, they all dream about having steady work, happy clients, and the chance to do what they know how to do.

My advice is to let folks do what they do. Find people trustworthy and then trust them. Don’t hire folks with whom you feel the need to oversee every detail. It can only work if overseeing that project is *your* full time job, and even then it could well not. If it isn’t your full time job then chances are it will consume every spare cycle you have and still leave you with all sorts of things you don’t like, didn’t want, and that cost you dearly. A far happier path is letting go, and trusting that you did a good job finding someone. Most of us are good at finding people we like. Inform them, work with them, show them examples. Talk about things other than your project and show them stuff you like in general. And if you like the decisions they’ve made elsewhere let them know. Design together. Talk through the ideas. Now let go, and let them do their job. It’s what you pay them for in the end.

I’ve done this successfully this year. And I’m trying it again right now. It is a work in progress so I won’t speak to it yet. But I will, success or failure, when it’s done.

Publishing has moved on

I’m going to talk about “content” for a minute. I’m going to define it as stuff I read. And what I realized is that going back to my earliest days of the web, I don’t consume content. I use it to support my writing, which is really an ongoing conversation with my friends.

In the final analysis we’re all media outlets now.

So my writing and thoughts (and yours as well) move from friend to friend through the social network, far from the original source of the story. Sources of stories that are shareable are preferable because I can weave them into my thoughts, display the context of my thinking, and minimize, in a shorthand kind of way, how much writing I need to do. And because linking is so important, a shareable amateur source is preferable to a professional source that requires me to pay, or worse, requires everyone to pay.

Someone who reports a car accident with a few cell snaps is doing a far better job than the person who picks up a report off the police blotter. Someone who visits the family and reports on how things are going is doing a far better job than someone who gets the “patient is stable” report from the hospital. What matters it turns out is not publishing, which has become easy at even a world wide level, but reporting, analysis, and story telling.

We should be talking about new models for employing reporters, photographers, authors, and story tellers of every sort, and not publishing. Publishing has already moved on…

letterpress.jpg

Feel at risk on the road as a cyclist?

[Update: An explanation from the DA.

Given that he had a clean history, Mr. Erzinger would essentially have been able to write a check, and the case would then be dismissed. On top of that, while Dr. Milo was still probably recovering from his injuries, Mr. Erzinger would be able to say that he had no criminal history and even deny that anything had happened. That is not something I could stomach.

I therefore offered that Mr. Erzinger plead guilty to leaving the scene of an accident and careless driving causing serious bodily injury.

This means that for the rest of his life, Mr. Erzinger will have on his record that he carelessly drove, caused another human being serious bodily injury and left the scene. He will lose his driver’s license, face potential jail time as determined by the judge and still have to pay restitution, which as I said in the Vail Daily is important to us but not an overriding objective in the plea.

Not bad. +1]

This simply will not do. (Short version… guy gets bounced off his bike by Mercedes driving wealth manager who leaves the scene. Felony charges have been dropped for ugly reasons.)

Sound off here:

Judicial District Attorney’s Office
Mr. Mark Hurlbert, District Attorney
955 Chambers Rd.,
P.O. Box 295 Eagle, CO. 81631
(970) 328-694 7; (970) 328- 1016 fax

or here.

iPads, Curriculum for Excellence and the Next Generation

[This is important enough to “reprint” in full. Go Fraser! Here’s a feed for the #ediff hashtag on twitter]

iPads, Curriculum for Excellence and the Next Generation:

There’s been an incredibly fertile discussion channel on Twitter since last Friday, organised around the hashtag #ediff.

I was working on a presentation about our iPad deployment when Frank Crawford (@frankcrawford) posted three tweets that chimed almost exactly with the topics I was working into my presentation.

Frank’s first tweet:

Outcomes for kids – CfE – learning, being confident, contributing, participating. Where does tech contribute?

I’ve been developing a presentation to explain where we see our 1:1 iPad deployment in the light of Curriculum for Excellence. Inspired by Frank’s tweets, I’d like to expand on some of the thinking here.

Successful Learners

The iPad will not create successful learners by itself. We are finding, however, that the increased relevance of iPad-based teaching is producing increased levels of engagement both in class and with homework and study at home. Engagement is a necessary condition for success but it is not, alone, sufficient.

We often get questions like “well, how do you know your pupils are learning when you teach with the iPad?”. The answer, usually, is “the same ways we know pupils are learning when we teach with textbooks, paper, whiteboards, multiple-choice tests, art materials or newspapers”.

What the iPad has allowed us to do is to bring digital resources up to the same level of availabiliy as paper resources in our teaching. It’s unthinkable that pupils would only have one or two hours of access to books each week, yet that was the position with digital resources before we deployed the iPad.

Confident Individuals

When pupils learn with the iPad, they are learning in their own technological vocabulary. Personal computers – whether Windows or Mac OS X – are not most teenagers’ common experience of personal computing.

We find that pupils are incredibly confident in using the iPad and that this feeds into confidence in their work. Our art teacher, Jenny Oakley, recently talked to me about the impact of iPad on her art teaching.

She told me that the iPad forms a kind of “digital safety net”:

In some ways it more effectively helps pupils to develop confidence in their abilities and an enthusiasm to try than some traditional media. This is largely due to the immediacy of its set up, tidy up and effects, the security of an ‘undo’ button and that mark making is controlled directly by the finger itself.

Pupils do not have to overcome the hindrance of learning to manipulate another tool or implement, rather they can use the natural tool they have been developing dexterity in since birth. Once taught the basic principles of a range of art apps, pupils can achieve worthwhile results. They then begin to feel more confident and so become more willing to try – in the art classroom this is half the battle.

As a direct follow on from this pupils then do actually begin to achieve better results – their increased confidence increases their effort and enthusiasm and they feel less threatened and more relaxed. This confidence can then be extended and transferred into other art media.

We are seeing same impacts in other areas, such as creative writing at all levels from Primary to Higher English, where digital text editing and peer evaluation are producing excellent results.

We are also focusing heavily on presentation skills using Keynote on the iPad. It is my personal belief that Word Processing – setting text on a computer in preparation for printing on paper – is a skill that will wane in value over time. Communicating your ideas to an audience is a skill that is already a clear competitive advantage for those able to do it effectively. Few skills demand the development of confidence like public presenting.

Effective Contributors

iPad is removing the friction in contributing. At its simplest, the easy flow of documents to and from the iPad has already transformed our processes of setting and submitting homework.

In class, we are seeing greater collaboration and sharing with iPad. The design of iPad directly lends itself to working together and collaborating – even without specific software support for networked collaboration. The iPad can be handed over to another pupil, turned around to show results and quickly connected to a classroom projector to share work with the entire class.

Compare this to the prior experience of trying to turn a desktop computer monitor around to share your work with someone else, or the experience of three or four pupils huddling around one computer to collaborate.

An example from Computing: we often do exercises where pupils are given a purpose and a budget for buying a computer system and they have to specify a couple of options and recommend one.

In earlier times I, in my “exam conditions” mentality, would often force this to be a solo exercise. Recently, I tried it with paired working with two iPads: one pupil worked the web to find results and the other pupil operated Numbers on their iPad to catalogue what they were finding together. They collaborated on the recommendations then, at the end, emailed me their spreadsheet and CC’ed the web-searching pupil so both had a copy of the shared work.

Each pupil made a solid contribution to the outcome and the results were effortlessly shared.

Responsible Citizens

Acting responsibly online is just one (admittedly huge) aspect of the entire citizenship agenda. As a big part of the iPad deployment, we comprehensively reworked our Acceptable Use Policy to make direct references to resources such as social networking as well as the more usual email and web publishing.

Responsible citizenship goes further. By sending iPads home with most pupils, we are giving them access to global sources of information and we’re working with that in class. No longer can pupils use the “we don’t get the newspaper in our house” excuse for being unaware of current events.

Here’s a comment from our Modern Studies teacher, Emma Rukin:

The tasks have become more challenging and worthwhile, as the iPad allows for multi-faceted tasks to be set that combine reading, comprehension, source analysis and internet research in one. Similarly, pupils who require extra support with, for example, a written task, are much happier being emailed a writing frame than being given extra sheets in class.

The biggest difference I am noticing is that pupils are increasingly suggesting uses for the iPad themselves. In particular, after just a few weeks of iPad 1:1 deployment, pupils are asking if they can use the internet to supplement answers from textbooks, or to find out about particular things that interest or confuse them. In the upper half of secondary pupils have improved dramatically in their ability to find relevant accurate answers using the web. They are improving their ability to frame a question.

All Modern studies pupils now have access to a wide variety of news sources, meaning their knowledge of current affairs is growing, and their weekly assessments reflect this.

One of our English teachers, Rosalind Creighton, sent me this:

The S2 class have been analysing some of the articles that have been written about the implementation of iPads in the school. I emailed them a document with links to various articles and questions on each article. This made it much easier for us to read the articles as a class, and saved on photocopying.

The purpose of this unit of work is to teach children how to assess the reliability and credibility of sources; recognise bias; and understand the techniques writers will use to persuade their readers (all CfE experiences and outcomes!).

I’d particularly like to thank certain sections of the press for providing Mrs. Creighton with such a, well, broad spectrum of material to work with.

What Technology Should Be

Frank also tweeted the following desiderata for the use of technology from a learner’s perspective. The tweets are here and here – I’ve just reformatted them in a list for this blog.

As a learner, technology should be:

  1. Everywhere, ready to use.
  2. Easy to use.
  3. Desirable to use.
  4. Challenging my skills.
  5. Sharable
  6. Collaborative
  7. It should play to my passions
  8. Used in useful contexts (from the learner’s perspective)
  9. Authentic

I believe that point #1 is well placed at the top. We are convinced that the ubiquity of 1:1 deployment is the sine qua non in transforming our learning and teaching. Without 1:1, you lose the sense of personal engagement with a personal device. The pupils’ sense of ownership is dramatically diminished.

I don’t think I have to make a case to readers of this blog that the iPad is, by any measure, easy and desirable to use.

Making sure that iPad use challenges the skills of a learner is a big question that we are all on a learning curve with right now. I think the whole school staff are only just starting to understand how far we can really push pupils equipped with their own iPad. As readers of this blog can probably tell from the changed tone of my posts over the last few weeks, this is precisely where my thinking is going right now.

I’ve already discussed the capabilities of the iPad in sharing and collaboration, but one more story: last week, I was accosted in the corridor by two pupil reporters wanting to interview me about iPads for the school newsletter. I was running around fixing wifi base stations and quite busy. Instead of taking me to a classroom where they could formally interview me and type my answers into a computer, we found a couple of seats in the hallway. They pulled out their iPads and we did the interview questions and they took notes on my answers right there and then.

Instant, frictionless, collaboration and sharing using high technology transparently with a strong focus on the actual task of “doing the interview” rather than “doing the interview and recording the answers on the laptops that we have booked for this one afternoon of the week”.

We have only given one directive to our teachers for using the iPad: it should be used everywhere it’s useful and nowhere that it’s not. We did not dictate many specific uses for the device, preferring to leave it to classroom teachers to identify the places where the device will be useful for each subject’s unique requirements.

The only specific use we dictated was that everyone should use the Calendar app to record homework. That’s a useful context for learners and we’re seeing dramatic improvements in homework return rates.

Frank appended a “(yuk)” to the last idea of authenticity but I think there is a point to be made here. I personally believe that pupils – particularly early secondary pupils – crave relevance and authenticity in their learning. I can teach about mainframes and disk drives and everyone’s bored. When I facilitate a discussion about why Apple switched from hard drives in the iPod Classic to flash memory in the iPhone, everyone wants to talk about it.

By deploying the iPad in the school and using real-world commercial software instead of “education-specific” clones of real software, we are delivering an authentic experience in school that mirrors and is relevant to the experience of technology that pupils have outside the school and bring to school with them.

[So there ya go. I’ve been thinking about how to correct this situation for Noah for weeks now.
Source: Fraser Speirs

10 • 10 • 10 “You be the good one.”

You be the good one.jpg

My mother’s mother was born October 10th, 1910.

It’s October, 2010. That’s two of three tens. In a few days I’ll celebrate her life on the day of her 100th birthday. Sadly, it will be without her.

She reminded each of her grandchildren, in the midst of any conflict, “You be the good one.”

Excellent advice for anyone.

Join me next Sunday in this centenary celebration by taking a moment in the midst of whatever you’re doing, especially if you are arguing with someone, or on the verge of a conflict, to remember her words, and act on them. You’ll be better for it I assure you.

She also made unmatchable tuna salad, and the very best sweet gefilte fish ever. No holiday goes by without our thinking of her.

She was the good one. Always.

★ Then Welcome to Android

★ Then Welcome to Android:

Google vice-president for engineering Vic Gundotra, on-stage at the I/O developer conference in May, regarding why Google created Android:

If Google didn’t act, it faced a draconian future where one
man, one phone, one carrier were our choice. That’s a future we
don’t want.

Skyhook Wireless, in their “complaint and jury demand” filed against Google yesterday (I’m hosting a copy of their entire filing (PDF), and I highly recommend you read it — it’s not long, and is written in pretty straightforward plain language), regarding Google’s control over which devices have access to the Android Market:

22. Google’s established practice in determining Android
compliance consists of two steps. The first step requires each
Android-enabled device, and its embedded software, to be run
against the Compatibility Test Suite (CTS), a software-based
test platform that objectively evaluates whether the device
and software are compatible with the published Android
specifications. The second step involves a review of the
device and software based on an amorphous outline of
additional, non-standardized requirements known as the
Compliance Definition Document (CDD). This entirely subjective
review, conducted solely by Google employees with ultimate
authority to interpret the scope and meaning of the CDD as
they see fit, effectively gives Google the ability to
arbitrarily deem any software, feature or function
“non-compatible” with the CDD.

23. On information and belief, Google has notified OEMs that they
will need to use Google Location Service, either as a condition
of the Android OS-OEM contract or as a condition of the Google
Apps contract between Google and each OEM. Though Google
claims the Android OS is open source, by requiring OEMs to use
Google Location Service, an application that is inextricably
bundled with the OS level framework, Google is effectively
creating a closed system with respect to location positioning.
Google’s manipulation suggests that the true purpose of
Android is, or has become, to ensure that “no industry player
can restrict or control the innovations of any other”, unless
it is Google.

Vic Gundotra, at I/O:

If you believe in openness, if you believe in choice, if you
believe in innovation from everyone, then welcome to Android.

[I’ve really got nothing to add. It should be no surprise that Google the enterprise acts like an enterprise. Just keep it mind when you use their “free” services. If a service is free, then you are the product. And this applies to all companies. Caveat emptor was never so applicable.]
Source: Daring Fireball