Hiltzik: Anti-doping authorities don’t play fair against athletes – latimes.com:
The same people lining up to brand Lance Armstrong a cheater will worship a pitcher who undergoes Tommy John transplant surgery to save his career. The Oakland A’s Bartolo Colon will be missing 50 games for taking testosterone, but what about the batters he’s faced who have had their eyeballs surgically refabricated with Lasik so they can read his pitches better?
Is the rule that it’s OK to enhance your performance by scalpel but not by hypodermic needle? Then let’s discuss that and establish exactly what the grounds are for the distinction. Until we clear that up, along with why caffeine isn’t on the banned list but marijuana is, athletes will try anything they can to beat their records, thrill the masses and make money. And why not?
It’s all well and good to say the goal of the anti-doping system is to ensure that sports stay clean, and it’s certainly true that clean athletes have every reason to resent having to compete against cheaters.
But we’ve created a strange way to uphold these principles — a system that writes its own rule book, moves the goal posts at will, lies and fabricates to get the score it wants and fiercely resists playing before an objective umpire. Whatever you choose to think of Lance Armstrong, his case is just one more indication that the supposed guardians of honesty and integrity in sports are among the filthiest players of all.
[Excellent points all. The only part of these proceedings that make sense is the “don’t cheat” stuff.]
2 thoughts on “Hiltzik: Anti-doping authorities don’t play fair against athletes”
Last I checked Lasik pretty safe as is Tommy John. Steroids? Not so much.
Yeah, but that wasn’t the point. The point was that there’s no clear determination about safety being made. So it’s not about any specific drug, but that no amount of all sorts of stuff is considered cheating, but great amounts of other stuff is not. And it seems to be based on technique rather than safety.